From 23455a0ebf1a944a4b00bde65074fea3d3c04e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexander Neundorf Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 21:40:24 +0000 Subject: Add a short version of the BSD copyright notice. Is it ok that way ? I just reference licenses/BSD without further explanation where to find the licenses/ subdirectory. This is legal stuff, so I could need some good advice from somebody who knows this better than me. The BSD license in kdelibs/licenses/BSD also doesn't contain the no-endorsement clause: # The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products # derived from this software without specific prior written permission. Is there a special reason why it doesn't ? If I would like to have this clause too, do I need to add another license file to licenses/ or should I simply put it in the same directory as the cmake scripts ? Then one could simply state: # This code is available under the BSD license, see the accompanying cmake-script-licensing. So, what's the correct and best way to deal with this ? Alex CCMAIL: kde-core-devel@kde.org svn path=/trunk/KDE/kdelibs/; revision=580959 --- modules/FindLibXml2.cmake | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/modules/FindLibXml2.cmake b/modules/FindLibXml2.cmake index 29682e07..037ab383 100644 --- a/modules/FindLibXml2.cmake +++ b/modules/FindLibXml2.cmake @@ -5,6 +5,9 @@ # LIBXML2_INCLUDE_DIR - the LibXml2 include directory # LIBXML2_LIBRARIES - the libraries needed to use LibXml2 # LIBXML2_DEFINITIONS - Compiler switches required for using LibXml2 +# +# Copyright (c) 2006, Alexander Neundorf +# This code is available under the BSD license, see licenses/BSD for details. if (LIBXML2_INCLUDE_DIR AND LIBXML2_LIBRARIES) -- cgit v1.2.1